Friends of Texas Public Schools
What's New
gold bullet Dropout factories aren't found in schools
gold bullet $4.2 Million in Grants for T-STEM Academies and Early College High Schools
gold bullet

Poised for Greatness

gold bullet Texas students outperform national average on NAEP math
gold bullet Texas schools are meeting NCLB requirements!
gold bullet Texas SAT scores rise in reading and math
gold bullet Friends Challenges Misleading Coverage
gold bullet Helping who live better, where?
gold bullet First LEED Certified School in Texas Announced
gold bullet Tom Frost named 2007 Friend of the Year
gold bullet TAKS passing rates hit record highs
gold bullet
Scores Up Since 'No Child' Was Signed
gold bullet
Best of Texas Awards
gold bullet
5th Grade Math TAKS Scores Improve
gold bullet
5th graders passing TAKS jumps 2%
gold bullet
Can cash buy good schools?
gold bullet
Thinking About Education
gold bullet
Raise Your Hand
gold bullet
Finally, a school of thought I can back
gold bullet
Moses Joins Board
gold bullet
FOTPS speaks to Katy ISD Teachers of the Year
 
  Reading List
   
Webii Website Services


260 Nobel Prizes in Science: U.S. Science Education the World’s Best
Monday, November 14, 2005
Center for the Study of Jobs and Education in Wisconsin And United States
By Dennis W. Redovich

 

 

The United States leads the world in technology, scientific research and the quality of its scientists because U.S. science education is the worlds best.  From 1951 to 2005 Americans have won 195 or 56% of the 350 Nobel Prizes awarded in Medicine, Physics and Chemistry. In October 2005 the Americans were awarded four of the eight Nobel Prizes for science achievement. The country of citizenship of Nobel Prize winners in 2005 is; Medicine: Australia 2, Physics: American 2, Germany 1, Chemistry: American 2, France 1 (See page 2 Nobel Prizes in Science 1951 to 2005)     

The United States is the uncontested leader of the world in scientific research in respect to published accomplishments, Nobel Prizes, volume of research and expenditures on scientific research. The United States is the leader of the world in technology and the unchallenged leader of the world in the global economy. The United States dominates the world because of its educational systems, including K-12 public education that produces the most highly educated, productive and successful workforce in the world.

It is incomprehensible how American K-12 public school critics, including politicians and conservative think tanks, are allowed to get away with the bashing of all American K-12 schools based on bogus analysis of useless international tests without serious challenge by an academically disadvantaged media. Critics of American public schools use K-12 education as the scapegoat for all of the social and economic problems of the United States

The media and experts the media chooses to quote frequently declare the following:

1.      American elementary and secondary education is below the academic level of education in other countries, particularly in science and mathematics.

2.      The quality of American colleges and universities is generally considered to be exalted in the world of postsecondary education.         

How could both of these statements be correct? The first statement is absolute nonsense and the second is absolutely true. American colleges and universities attract students from all over the world, particularly in science and engineering because it is believed that they are the best in the world. American university students who primarily come from American high schools that produce large numbers of bright, innovative, competitive, and hard working graduates create the high quality of American colleges and universities. Universities are as good as their students. Another reason for the superiority of American postsecondary education is the exemplary democratic American culture, which is the most competitive and utilitarian in the world.    

American K-12 public education systems get none of the credit for the United States leadership in science, technology and the global economy for the last 60 years. There is absolutely no crisis in American K-12 science education or shortage of outstanding scientists. About 5% of jobs in the United States projected to 2012 might require higher math and or science course work. (See www.jobseducationwis.org 210 Top 206 Job Titles for Employment in the United States in 2012)

Nobel Prizes in Science –Chemistry, Physics and Medicine 1951 to 2004

The United States is by far the leading country in the world since 1951 in awards of Nobel Prizes in Science, which include Chemistry, Physics and Medicine-Physiology. United States scientists received 195 or 56% of the 350 Nobel Prizes in Science awarded from 1951 to 2005. The United States has received a majority of Nobel Prizes in Science each decade from 1951 to 2000. From 1991 to 2005 U.S. scientists earned 59 (57.8%) of the 102 Nobel Prizes awarded in Science. The following table shows the top 10 countries in the world in numbers of Nobel Prizes in Science awarded 1951 to 2005.  

Top 10 Countries in the World – Nobel Prizes in Science 1951 to 2005

Country of Citizenship

 Chemistry

Physics

Medicine

Total Nobel Prizes

Nobel Prizes-Science

Nobel Prizes

Nobel Prizes

Nobel Prizes*

In Science 1951-2005

 

102*

123*

125*

350*

1. United States

48 (47%)

75 (61%)

72 (58%)

195 (56%) of all Prizes

2. Great Britain

19 (19%)

7 (6%)

19 (15%)

45 (13%)

3. Germany

10 (11%)

13 (11%)

9 (7%)

32 (9%)

4. Russia

1 (1%)

9 (8%)

2 (2%)

12 (4%)

5. France

1 (1%)

4 (3%)

5 (4%)

10 (3%)

6. Sweden

0

2 (2%)

6 (5%)

 8 (2%)_

6. Japan

4 (4%)

3 (3%)

1 (1%)

8 (2%)

8. Canada

3 (3%)

2 (2%)

0

5 (2%)

8. Dutch

1 (1%)

4 (3%)

0

5 (2%)

8. Switzerland

2 (2%)

0

3 (2%)

5 (2%)

*Includes the remaining countries of the world that won 26 Nobel Science Prizes

1951 to 2005 Chemistry 13 (13%) Physics 4 (3%) Medicine 9 (6%) Total 26 (5%)

Nobel Prizes in Science 1901-2005  

1901 to 1950 and 1951 to 2005 Nobel Prizes for sciences were awarded as follows:

Nobel Prizes for Chemistry 1901 to 2001

 

 

 

Americans

All of Europe

All Other Countries

Total

1901-1950

7 (15%)

39 (85%

0

46

1951-2005

48 (47%)

41 (40%)

13(13%)

102

Nobel Prizes for Physics

 

 

 

1901-1950

9 (17%)

43 (80%)

2 (4%)

54

1951-2005

75 (61%)

42 (34%)

6 (5%)

123

Nobel prizes for Medicine and Physiology

 

 

1901-1950

15 (25%)

44 (73%)

1 (2%)

60

1951-2005

72 (58%)

47 (38%)

6 (5%)

125

 Total Nobel Prizes for Science

 

 

                      Americans        All of Europe

All Other Countries

Total

1901-1950

31 (19%)

126 (79%)

3 (2%)

160

1951-2005

195 (56%)

129 (37%)

26 (7%)

350

1901-2005

226 (44%)

255 (50%)

29 (6%)

510

 (Sources: World of Winners Gale Research, World Almanac 1999, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel October 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005))   

The percentage of Americans receiving Nobel prizes in Science  (chemistry, physics, physiology or medicine) increased from 19%, 31 prizes 1901 to 1950, to 56%, 195 prizes from 1951 to 2005. The Europeans completely dominated the winning of Nobel prizes for the first 30 years (Germans and British were the biggest winners). Americans received only 6 prizes in the first 30 years (Europeans earned 86) and Americans received their first prizes in Physics 1907, Chemistry 1914 and Physiology or Medicine 1930. Since 1950 Americans have dominated the winning of Nobel prizes in Physics and Physiology or Medicine and have been about equal in Chemistry. However, since 1980 Americans have won 28 Chemistry prizes while all of Europe has won 21.

Critics of American science education have implied that foreign-born scientists are the primary reason for the American dominance in science since World War II. That is not the case. In the tabulations by country in this study the country designated for the scientist is the country where the scientific work was done. For example, Albert Einstein received a 1921 Nobel Prize for work he did in Germany and was counted as a German recipient and not as a U.S. citizen. Dramatic increases of American recipients of Nobel prizes have occurred since 1970 with a few foreign-trained scientists earning prizes. On the other hand, many foreign born scientists come to the U.S to receive their advanced science education and then remain in the U.S. because the world knows that the U.S. is the best in science.  If a Nobel Prize winner is not a U.S. citizen and earns a Nobel Prize in the U.S. they are counted as a recipient from their native country.

            The visible quality accomplishments of American scientists and engineers are recognized throughout the world.  At a European conference for institutional research held in Trier Germany in 1989 a German presenter pointed out that Americans had received 41 Nobel Prizes for chemistry and physics from 1979 to 1989 while all of Europe earned 20.  The speaker used this data as part of his criticism of European science education as compared to the United States .  When I asked him how many Nobel Prizes the Japanese had received in the last ten years he said two. (Japan has won only 8 Nobel Prizes in Science 1901-2005, 2 in 2002) Japanese universities are not highly regarded in the world for their academics, but Europeans and Americans have feared the economic strength of Japan until the later 1990s when their economic strength severely declined. (Unbelievably, in the 1980s and early 1990s American economists were foolishly saying that the superiority of the Japanese economy was because their K-12 education systems were superior to the United States .)

            The quality of American education continues to improve as the media berates it based on irrelevant and invalid standardized testing. Insane is too mild a term for the standardized testing mania that is sweeping the United States . Some praise for American students at all educational levels might motivate our exemplary American schools to improve even more. There is no doubt; American schools produce the finest scientists in the world. And the American educational systems, most notably including American K-12 education, continue to upgrade the quality of their science graduates each year.

My views are based on 50 years of active experience in American education as an administrator, educational researcher and a chemist who taught chemistry at the secondary and university level in the 1950’s and 60’s.  

Dennis W. Redovich, redovich@execpc.com
Originally written October 1992 and revised each year October 1993 to 2005
See www.jobseducationwis.org for Center reports on American Education  
As a public speaker or as a consultant he may be contacted at 6438 Sycamore St. Greendale WI 53129 414-421-1120
 

Return to Top of News Page

Copyright © Friends of Texas Public Schools. All rights reserved. | Web site design and hosting by Webii.net